The latest paper in CIGI’s SSR Issue Papers series by Alejandro Pachon focuses on the size of external support for SSR activities, showing that agencies often discuss the effectiveness of SSR programming without the benefit of a comprehensive system for tracking SSR assistance. It examines the information that is often used to demonstrate how international support for SSR has increased — and discusses why such data is both incomplete and faulty given the context of how it is collected. To access the paper, click here.
The paper suggests that using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) alone does not capture a true picture of the patterns of overall SSR expenditure — it needs to be supplemented with data that includes contributions to projects that are not deemed “developmental” by the OECD. Although not all SSR assistance should be considered development assistance, including all SSR contributions is important in order to obtain an accurate representation of the donations made to SSR programs, enabling the evaluation of the policy effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of these reform efforts across countries.
Tags: development, OECD, SSR, SSR expenditure
